This issue covers how many people Canada deported or removed each year from 1925 to 2025, per 100,000 residents. It comes in three images: the chart, the Party Scoreboard (Liberal vs Conservative / PC) and the PM Scoreboard (the average under each Prime Minister).
On the chart, each year is shaded by the federal party in office for most of that year: red for Liberal, blue for Conservative and Progressive Conservative (PC). Diagonal stripes mark minority governments.
This is the hardest measure we have charted. No single official count runs through the century: the count before 1972 and the count from 1984 measure different things, and we found no usable yearly figures for 1972 to 1983. So each era is scored on its own, and this issue tests the party comparison several ways.
In brief. In 2025 Canada removed 23,160 people, 55.7 for every 100,000 residents, the highest since the removals count began in 1984; 27% of them were administrative removals of people who had already left, and without those the rate would be 40.6. From 1925 to 1971, the yearly rate of people deported after admission peaked at 71.5 in 1932, in the Depression, and stayed below 7 from 1935 to 1967. From 1984, removals rose from 6.5 per 100,000 in 1986 to 54.5 in 2012, fell to 19.7 in 2021 and rose again to 2025. Before 1972, Conservative and PC years average 20.3 per 100,000 against 8.1 in Liberal years, but the median years (the middle year when the years are lined up from lowest to highest) are close (4.2 and 3.9) and the gap comes from the Depression years 1930 to 1935: without them, Liberal years are higher. From 1984, the two are almost the same: 28.3 in Liberal years and 27.4 in Conservative and PC years. Shading and ranks show who was in office, not who caused the result.

The numbered markers give context, not credit or blame:
1929: Great Depression begins
1945: Japanese Canadian deportation
1953: New Immigration Act in force
1967: Deportation appeal board
1978: Immigration Act in force
1989: Refugee board begins
1995: Danger-to-public appeal bar
2002: IRPA in force
2012: Safe-country list (DCO)
2020: COVID-19 pandemic
2024: Funds for 25% more removals
We marked 11 of the many events that federal records, the Library of Parliament, the courts or the federal government's museums and archives tie to deportations or to the rules for removing people: two world events and nine federal measures. Of the nine measures, seven fall in Liberal years and two in Conservative and PC years; Liberals held office in 70 of the 101 years. We considered other events and did not mark them, because we found no source that ties them to removals or because they sit too close to another marker to read. Unlike the Comments column, markers can include a funding decision when a source ties it to removals (2024). IRPA is the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act; DCO stands for designated countries of origin, a list of countries whose citizens' refugee claims were handled faster and with fewer appeals.
What counts as a deportation
Canada's official count changed twice, and the chart shows both counts without joining them.
From 1925 to 1971 the count is people "deported after admission": people admitted to Canada and later sent out of the country, as the immigration department reported them and the Canada Year Book printed them. Until the early 1950s the totals include family members who left with them (7% to 13% of the totals in 1930 to 1934). People refused at the border are not in it. The tables for the 1940s and early 1950s (Year Books of 1948-49, 1951 and 1952-53) are titled "Deportations of Immigrants and Others". For 1925 to 1929 only fiscal years are printed (April to March); each is charted in the year it starts.
From 1984 the count is removals carried out: people who left Canada under a removal order, as the immigration department, then Citizenship and Immigration Canada and, from 2003, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) reported them. Since 2018 this count also includes "administrative removals": people recorded as removed because the agency confirmed they had already left on their own. Those were 1,684 in 2019, 8,644 in 2020 (67% of that year's total) and 27% of the 2025 total.
Between the two, we found no usable yearly count:
The department told the Senate in 1974 that it had no figure for 1972.
For 1973 the Senate was given 7,110 deportations and the minister gave 5,959 "actual deportation orders", including people refused at ports; for 1974, only the first eight months (7,401). Neither matches either era's count, so neither is charted.
For 1975 to 1981 we found only the number of removal orders issued (for the years from April 1978), not people removed.
For 1982 two official figures disagree: "as high as 4,600" removals (an associate deputy minister to a Commons committee in 1991) and 6,350 "removals effected" in the year from April 1982 (the department's spending estimates). They appear to come from different counting systems, so 1982 is left empty.
For 1983 we found only a forecast; the department's spending estimates for later years and a 1986 return to Parliament may hold actual figures for the early 1980s, but they are not online.
Where only a fiscal-year figure exists (1925 to 1929, and from 1984: 1984, 1985, 1987, 1993, 2004 to 2008 and 2014 to 2016), the chart shows it as a dashed line, in the year the fiscal year starts. Where both exist, the two can differ by a fifth: 6,438 removals in calendar 1994 against 5,050 in the year from April 1994. Nothing is estimated to fill the gaps.
The rate divides each year's count by the number of residents on July 1, the same population as the immigrants issue (Statistics Canada's July 1 estimate from 1971; its June 1 estimate multiplied by 1.018 before).
Why the number moved
The reasons below are the ones official sources support.
The Depression. Deportations after admission were about 1,600 to 2,000 a year from 1925 to 1928, then 3,963 in the year from April 1929, and 7,647 in 1932, 71.5 per 100,000. The immigration department's own history says an estimated 30,000 immigrants were deported between 1930 and 1935 (the Year Book's totals for those years add to 25,769). The sources tie these deportations to the existing Act's grounds, chiefly becoming a public charge (unable to support oneself); we found no new law behind them.
The war and after. The rate fell to 1.5 in 1944, the low of the series. Orders in December 1945 provided for deporting Japanese Canadians; the department's history says about 4,000 of them left for Japan under pressure, through what the government called a "repatriation" scheme, and the Year Book counts only 343 deportations for 1946. The rate stayed between 1.5 and 4.4 from 1937 to 1964.
The late 1960s. An Immigration Appeal Board, set up in 1967, gave anyone ordered deported a right of appeal. Deportations after admission rose from 841 in 1965 to 4,027 in 1971, 18.3 per 100,000; we found no source that explains the rise.
1984 to 2012. Removals fell to 1,702 in 1986, 6.5 per 100,000 (the year from April 1987 was slightly lower, the low of the second era), then rose to 7,138 in 1992 and to 18,921 in 2012, 54.5 per 100,000. The Immigration and Refugee Board began in 1989. A 1995 law barred appeals for people in serious-criminality categories whom the minister judged a danger to the public. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act took effect in 2002, and the designated-countries list in December 2012.
2013 to 2025. Removals fell to 7,995 in the year from April 2016, 22.1 per 100,000. In 2020 all scheduled removals were postponed from March 17 because of the pandemic, yet the year's count was 12,858, because two-thirds were administrative removals of people who had already left. The count fell to 7,523 in 2021 and rose to 23,160 in 2025, of which 27% were administrative removals. The federal government's December 2024 economic statement funded the agency to raise removals by 25%; we found no source that measures how much of the rise that explains.
Party Scoreboard: Deportation rate

The Party Scoreboard gives each era its own rows, because the two counts measure different things. From 1925 to 1971 it counts 47 years, 36 Liberal and 11 Conservative and PC: the average was 10.9 per 100,000 across the era, 8.1 in Liberal years and 20.3 in Conservative and PC years, and the median 3.9, 3.9 and 4.2. From 1984 to 2025 it counts the 42 years with a figure, 23 Liberal and 19 Conservative and PC: the average was 27.9, 28.3 in Liberal years and 27.4 in Conservative and PC years, and the median 26.9, 26.9 and 25.2. The median is the middle value when the years are lined up from lowest to highest; a few extreme years pull an average a long way, and the median is less affected.
Is the comparison fair?
We tested each era several ways.
Chance. To see how large a gap chance alone produces, we shuffled the party labels across each era's years 100,000 times. Before 1972, a gap at least as large as the board's 12.2 came up in 2% of the shuffles; from 1984, a gap as large as 1.0 came up in 81%. Neighbouring years resemble each other, so we also kept each party's unbroken stretches in office together and tried every way of assigning the parties to them. Each era has only five stretches, which can be assigned in 10 ways, so this test can never show less than 10%. Before 1972, 4 of the 10 gave a gap at least as large (40%). From 1984, all 10 did. Read together: the gap before 1972 is unusual for scattered years, but it comes from one run of years, and the stretch test cannot tell it apart from chance.
The Depression years. The five Conservative years 1931 to 1935 include the two highest years of the deported-after-admission count (1932 and 1931). Without 1930 to 1935, the first era's order reverses: Liberal years average 7.2 per 100,000 and Conservative and PC years 3.5 (the remaining Conservative years are Diefenbaker's). That reversal is itself well within chance: 22% of the shuffles gave a gap that large, and 3 of the 4 stretch arrangements did. Counting only calendar years (leaving out the fiscal years 1925 to 1929) widens the first era's gap: Conservative and PC years 20.3, Liberal years 5.8, a gap that came up in under 1% of the shuffles but in 5 of the 10 stretch arrangements.
Timing. Compared with each decade's own average, Conservative and PC years before 1972 ran 6.2 above and Liberal years 1.9 below; from 1984, Conservative and PC years ran 2.4 above and Liberal years 1.9 below. Both gaps came up often in the stretch arrangements (20% and 50%).
Spans of the second era. (1984 counts as a Liberal year because Liberals held office for most of it, but its figure covers April 1984 to March 1985, mostly under a Progressive Conservative government. Counted as Conservative, the Liberal lead widens to about 29.0 against 26.7.)
Calendar years only (leaving out the dashed fiscal years): 28.6 in Liberal years against 27.9.
Before administrative removals were counted in volume (1984 to 2017): Conservative and PC years higher, 27.4 against 25.9.
Without administrative removals (2019 to 2025 with them taken out): Conservative and PC years higher, 27.4 against 25.2.
Under the CBSA (2003 to 2025): Conservative and PC years higher, 40.7 against 31.9, with medians of 41.6 and 32.8. That rests on the Conservative years 2006 to 2015, which include the 2012 peak. A gap that large came up in 4% of the shuffles, but in one of the three ways of assigning the parties to this span's three stretches.
Policy takes time. Crediting each year to the party in office the year before turns the second era's small Liberal lead into 29.1 against 27.2; before 1972 it narrows the Conservative and PC lead to 15.1 against 9.4, and with a two-year delay it reverses (Liberal 11.2, Conservative and PC 9.0). With a two-year delay, the second era's Liberal lead grows to 30.3 against 27.0.
The number of people, not the rate. Before 1972, Conservative and PC years average 2,315 people a year against 1,089 in Liberal years. From 1984, Liberal years average 9,812 and Conservative and PC years 8,957.
Volatility. Before 1972 the rate moved 9.2 per 100,000 a year on average in Conservative and PC years and 1.5 in Liberal years, almost all of it in the early 1930s; from 1984, 4.7 in Liberal years and 4.1 in Conservative and PC years.
What is left: before 1972, Conservative and PC years had a higher average rate because of the Depression deportations of 1930 to 1935; without those years Liberal years are higher, and the median years are close. From 1984 there is almost no difference on the full span, and which party comes out higher depends on the years and the count used. No gap is clearly larger than chance once neighbouring years are kept together. The count also depends on rules, refugee claims, agency funding and how removals are recorded, and the comparison cannot separate those from who held office. That describes who was in office when the number moved. It does not show that either party caused it.
PM Scoreboard: Deportation rate

The PM Scoreboard sorts each term by the average number of people deported or removed per 100,000 residents over the term's years with a figure, from the highest to the lowest. Rank 1 is the highest level, not the best or worst result. Terms up to 1971 count people deported after admission and terms from 1984 count removals, which include more kinds of cases, so the later terms sit higher partly because of the count.
Most rows are a term: one unbroken stretch as Prime Minister, however many elections it spans. Each year counts in proportion to the days in office that year, so 1957 counts partly for Louis St-Laurent and partly for John Diefenbaker. The "Years counted" column adds up those shares over the years that have a figure, so terms in the gap years count fewer years. The 14 ranked rows are 13 terms and one combined row.
R.B. Bennett's term ranks first, at 41.7 per 100,000 (1930 to 1935, the Depression deportations), then Stephen Harper (41.0) and Paul Martin (36.3). The lowest are Mackenzie King's third term (3.2, 1935 to 1948), John Diefenbaker (3.5) and Louis St-Laurent (3.6). Among the terms after 1984, Stephen Harper's is the highest and Brian Mulroney's the lowest (11.9); Justin Trudeau's is 28.7.
Several terms, one Prime Minister
Mackenzie King has a combined row, shaded grey, which weights each term by its years counted: all three terms 9.4. Pierre Trudeau's two terms are not combined, because the first is counted in the first era and the second in the second.
The short stretches
Five rows are listed below the ranking without a rank: Arthur Meighen's second term (16.5), Pierre Trudeau's second term (13.6), John Turner (13.6), Kim Campbell (24.6) and Mark Carney (55.7). Each rests on less than one year with a figure. Pierre Trudeau's second term (1980 to 1984) falls mostly in the gap years: only part of 1984 has a figure. Mark Carney took office in March 2025 and was in office for 0.8 of 2025, the latest full year of data.
The Comments column
The right-hand column of the PM Scoreboard names the federal laws, regulations and orders in council that changed who may be removed from Canada or how removal works (the grounds, removal orders, appeals and hearings, including who may have a refugee claim heard), counted in the term in which they took effect. The same test was applied to every Prime Minister, so several rows are blank; one item was not checked: the 1923 Chinese Immigration Act (Mackenzie King's first term) was not read for removal clauses.
Left out for every term:
enforcement drives under existing law (the 1930s deportations used the existing Act)
funding, operational pauses such as the 2020 suspension, and agency reorganizations such as the creation of the CBSA in 2003
changes in how removals are counted, and court rulings
agreements with other countries and the regulations that put them into effect (the Safe Third Country Agreement with the United States, 2004 and 2023), as in the immigrants issue
An order in council is a cabinet decision with legal force. Terms with nothing that passes the test have no comment, among them R.B. Bennett, John Diefenbaker and Paul Martin. Joe Clark's term (1979 to 1980) falls entirely in the years without a figure, so it has no row. Mark Carney's comment is a law that took effect in March 2026, after the chart's last year, for claims made from June 3, 2025. Comments give context. They do not assign credit or blame. Sources for every comment are in the source list at the end of the web version of this issue.
How the numbers were built
From 1925 to 1971 each year comes from the Canada Year Book's tables of deportations (the editions of 1934-35, 1942, 1948-49, 1951, 1952-53, 1961, 1966, 1970-71, 1972 and 1973), checked against the page images; where a table prints both the causes and the total, the rows add to the total in every year. From 1984 each year comes from the federal department or agency responsible: statements by the minister and officials to Commons committees (1986 and 1988 to 1992, 1994), Citizenship and Immigration Canada's performance reports (1995 to 2002), the CBSA's reports and open data (2003, 2009 to 2013), a CBSA briefing to the Commons immigration committee (2017 and 2018) and the CBSA's removal statistics page (2019 to 2025), with fiscal-year figures from the departments' spending estimates and performance reports where no calendar figure exists. The CBSA's own figures for a year differ slightly between versions of its statistics page; each figure is the one on the dated version listed in the sources.
Population: the July 1 estimate from 1971 (Statistics Canada, tables 17-10-0005-01 and 17-10-0009-01); the June 1 estimate multiplied by 1.018 for 1925 to 1970 (table 17-10-0063-01). The rate is people deported or removed divided by that population, times 100,000.
More on the method: How the charts work
Who we are: About Gov Scoreboard
Spot an error? Write to [email protected].
Sources: Canada Year Book (1934-35 to 1973), deportation tables; Employment and Immigration Canada, Citizenship and Immigration Canada and the Canada Border Services Agency (1984-2025); population adapted from Statistics Canada, Tables 17-10-0063-01, 17-10-0005-01 and 17-10-0009-01 (retrieved 2026-10-14). This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product.
Dates in office: House of Commons, Procedure and Practice (4th ed., 2025), Appendix 6.
Other sources in this issue: Canada Year Book, deportation tables, editions of 1934-35, 1942, 1948-49, 1951, 1952-53, 1961, 1966, 1970-71, 1972 and 1973 (scanned copies); Senate Debates, November 5, 1974 (1973 and 1974); House of Commons Standing Committee on Labour, Manpower and Immigration, April 23, 1974; House of Commons Standing Committee on Labour, Employment and Immigration, November 1991 (1982 and 1986) and March 24, 1993 (1986 and 1988 to 1992); Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, April 4, 1995 (1994); Employment and Immigration Canada, Part III Estimates of 1984-85, 1987-88 and 1990-91; Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Part III Estimates 1995-96 and 1997-98, and performance reports of 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003; Canada Border Services Agency, Report on Plans and Priorities 2004-05, departmental performance reports of 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09, Removals Processed by Region by Year (open data, 2009 to 2013), briefing to the Public Accounts committee of November 24, 2020 (fiscal 2014-15 to 2019-20), briefing to the Citizenship and Immigration committee of November 25, 2022 (2017 and 2018) and Immigration removal statistics (version of September 18, 2026; 2019 from the April 2026 version); Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Forging Our Legacy, chapters 4b, 5b and 6 (archived copies); Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21, Immigration Act, 1952; Landscapes of Injustice (University of Victoria), Library and Archives Canada file description of the December 15, 1945 orders; Federal Court of Appeal decisions on the 1978 and 1995 (in French) changes; Library of Parliament, Canada's Refugee Protection System and Recent Evolution of Canadian Immigration Policy; Canada Gazette, December 19, 2012; Public Safety Canada, note on removals during the pandemic and note on the 2024 funding; Department of Finance, Fall Economic Statement 2024.
Sources for the Comments column:
Mackenzie King, term 3: Landscapes of Injustice
Louis St-Laurent: Pier 21, Forging Our Legacy (archived)
Lester B. Pearson: Forging Our Legacy (archived)
Pierre Trudeau, term 1: Canada Year Book 1974, Forging Our Legacy (archived), Federal Court, Federal Court (2)
Justin Trudeau: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
Mark Carney: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
Gov Scoreboard
